English is a ridiculous language.
Our grammar, spelling, and usage rules appear only to exist so that the exceptions have something to lean against.
The "science" of the language, as intricate and exhaustive as it represents itself to be in tomes such a Fowler's Modern English Usage or the venerable Oxford English Dictionary, is in reality relegated to the status of the movies at The Oscars: mere gray backdrop for the real action of who shows up wearing whom, on whose arm, attending which stunning smile-when-you-don't-mean-it-because-you-lost party.
Yes, rules are rules, except when they aren't, as in most of English spelling.
Thus the reality of an unfortunate native-tongue speaker of a straight-up, WYSIWYG language such as German or Latin, where the rules are reliable and sturdy on their little brown legs, and leaning is discouraged as slothful.
Learning English must really suck lemons.
Take the title of this post. Aside from the word "has" (and were I less lazy, I'm sure I could have come up with a substitute that would have further proved my point), every word is a perfectly spelled scofflaw. Each breaks The Rule "I before E, except after C."
And that's just the Coles/Cliff notes version of the rule. The full version is, "I before E, except after C, or when sounding like "eh?" as in "neighbour" or "weigh." And even within that expanded rule, one encounters the Canadian versus American spelling controversy of "'u,' versus 'no u.'" And even at THAT, one stumbles over the "What is the correct way to indicate a quotation within a quotation?" question.
English. Weird.
Wow, I never stopped to notice that there are so many exceptions to the "I before E" rule, which is exposed as so flimsy and sufficiently deficient in your headline that, well, I'm headed straight for an English tavern. Why? To ponder linguistic discrepanCIEs, of course.
ReplyDelete